Thinking and Designing in Three Dimensions


Reading time ( words)

This article aims to encourage interconnect designers who design for flex or rigid-flex circuits to use the modern CAD tools at their disposal for getting flex done right the first time. While modeling PCBs in 3D is not new, and all the major PCB EDA vendors offer some form of 3D modeling and integration, it is still a rare circumstance that flexible circuit designers use 3D CAD modeling. Most still prefer to design in 2D spaces and build paper dolls.

There are some pretty significant advantages to using 3D-folded flex circuits and multiboard modeling in CAD such as ensuring correct board shape. You can also fold geometries before having to cut even one piece of paper, and avoid building an expensive prototype only to find the flex portion was slightly too long or short or components on the final assembly interfere with each other once it’s all in-situ.

Call me Captain Obvious!

These issues happen because of the disjoint between the design in our heads and the design in CAD. It’s important to recognize that in our own designer’s mind, we are already trying to think in three dimensions—mentally animating assembly processes and folding—and equally important, to recognize the need for capturing that inside view to validate and verify that it can actually work using the tools at our disposal. With plenty of margin and lots of experience, it might work out okay, but there’s no substitute for an accurate model to test.

Less obvious are the secondary and tertiary issues that can be highlighted and effectively dealt with by using 3D-enabled PCB and multiboard system design software. And by that, I mean taking a truly iterative design approach as opposed to the more typical linear method of creating the board outline in MCAD, importing to the PCB editor, developing the component placement and routing, then re-exporting to MCAD. The following are just a few areas where thinking and designing in three dimensions will make a nice improvement to your workflow.

To read the full version of this article which originally appeared in the January 2019 issue of FLEX007 Magazine, click here.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Decreasing Bend Radius and Improving Reliability—Part I

10/11/2019 | Kelsey Smith, All Flex
Many of the issues that arise when using a flex circuit come from a lack of knowledge about how to properly design one, especially when the circuit is required to bend.

Selecting the Proper Flex Coverlayer Material

09/06/2019 | Dave Lackey, American Standard Circuits
Coverlayers are polymer materials used to cover and protect the copper traces of the flex circuit product. There are a number of different options available for protecting the circuits, and they serve different design requirements in terms of cost, performance, and flexural endurance optimization. When specifying the choice, it is critical to call out not just the type of coverlayer material but also the thickness requirement. This can be very important in certain types of constructions, especially when a flex circuit will experience dynamic flexing during use.

American Standard Circuits' Ken Moffat on Flex and Rigid-flex Business

04/22/2019 | Patty Goldman, I-Connect007
Ken Moffat is the director of business development at American Standard Circuits, where covers a fairly broad territory from his base in Toronto throughout Canada and parts of the U.S. from east to west. In an interview with I-Connect007 at the recent West Penn SMTA Expo, Ken talks about the state of the flex and rigid-flex industry.



Copyright © 2019 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.