Stepping Up to Laser Processing for Flex, Part 2: Calculating and Optimizing Production


Reading time ( words)

A Process of Continual Improvement

In Part 1 of this series, we discussed the advantages of adding flex laser processing to gain a competitive advantage. In Part 2 we will build on that discussion, looking at the ways you can optimize your flexible circuit laser processing to get the efficiencies that drive lower cost of ownership. When considering the cost associated with adding FPC processing, where do you look, what should you expect, and how can you control or minimize those costs?

Controlling Fixed costs

Aside from the obvious system purchase price and its associated depreciation expense, there are a variety of other—and less significant—fixed costs to consider. These can include system installation and personnel training costs, costs to qualify the system prior to running production, floor space allocation overhead allocation costs, as well as the costs related to upgrading facilities to meet the system’s site requirements. We will discuss site preparation in Part 3.

Typical areas to watch for in laser system site requirements include electrical, vacuum, compressed air, environmental air, as well as temperature and humidity. Neglecting any of these can result in poor product yield, scrap, or even damage to and downtime on your valuable UV laser system. Poor electrical power quality and sporadic brownouts and blackouts often can result in unexpected system errors, yield issues, and scrap.

Extending System Longevity

Typical high-power UV lasers used for flex processing have lifespans ranging from 1–2 years, although those lifespans may be drawn out if the laser is not in 24/7 use or the laser powers used for processing are much lower than the system’s work surface laser power specification.

Read the full article here.


Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in the March 2016 issue of The PCB Magazine.

 

Share




Suggested Items

Time, Space, Structure, and Model Analysis of CCL Price Increase

04/19/2021 | Hu Yang, Zhongtai Securities Research Center
According to the CCL Association, copper foil accounts for the largest proportion of raw materials (traditional CCL uses epoxy resin, glass fiber cloth and copper as raw materials). Copper foil in thin plate accounts for about 30% of the overall cost; in thick plate copper accounts for 50%. In CCL production, using Shengyi Technology and Chaohua Technology as examples, the cost of raw materials accounts for about 88% of the total cost, with labor accounting for about 4%. Other costs such as equipment depreciation account for about 8%.

Happy’s DIY Solution to Chemical Control

12/09/2020 | Happy Holden, I-Connect007
I confess. I am a control nerd and highly analytical. My second degree is in EE control theory, and I see the world in terms of feedback loops and black boxes. Early in my career, I was volunteered for the technical programs for the California Circuits Association (CCA), which was created by my mentor Clyde Coombs. In discussions with fellow process engineers, it was clear that the chemical process controls that HP could afford and allow me to put in place were not able to be duplicated by much smaller PWB shops.

8 Measures for Sales and Operations Planning in Turbulent Times, Part 2

07/28/2020 | Fane Friberg, CEPHAS
In this series, CEPHAS principal Fane Friberg highlights the interdependent elements of an effective S&OP process for leaders of supply chain management. While some companies tend to fall back on the status quo, Freiberg highlights why it’s critical to actually increase the frequency of the S&OP rather than decrease the operations. His first focus was to stay committed to the process. Today, he discusses strategic imperatives.



Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.