Mentor Tools: Optimized for Flex and Rigid-flex Design


Reading time ( words)

With the launch of the new Flex007 section in Design007 Magazine, we asked David Wiens, product marketing manager with Mentor, a Siemens Business, to tell us about their tools’ flex and rigid-flex design capabilities. As David explains, today’s higher-end design software tools are optimized for flex design, making workarounds a thing of the past.

Andy Shaughnessy: What are your customers’ biggest challenges in designing rigid-flex?

David Wiens: Engineering teams have designed advanced rigid-flex products for years using a series of workarounds to their EDA tools, often verifying with paper dolls. Rigid-flex designs require advanced stackup constructs (e.g., multiple outlines, each with its own stackup, and new materials). There are also additional rules that need to be applied, including bend/fold control with collision clearances, curve routing with arcs and teardrops, hatched plane fill shapes, component placement limits in flex areas, and fabrication rules around board stiffeners and coverlays. The workarounds naturally take longer to implement and often result in errors because the design must be checked manually. This can lead to a non-optimized product because once something is designed, nobody wants to go back and make ECOs. Some errors, such as copper micro-cracks, create long-term product reliability issues. Manufacturing is also a challenge. Design teams must align with their manufacturer to understand the costs of different rigid-flex structures—costs can go up quickly—and optimize the hand-off from design to manufacturing.

Shaughnessy: Tell us about the rigid-flex design capabilities in the latest versions of Mentor’s tools.

Wiens: Our solution supports flex, rigid, or rigid-flex with a common set of functionality. Native support for flex/rigid-flex extends across the flow, from initial stackup definition through design validation and manufacturing outputs, eliminating time-consuming workarounds.

It starts with an independent stackup for each rigid or flex element; these can easily be modified or overlapped. This approach limits the board outline and stackup modifications necessary when the shape of the board changes. With flex stackups, there are additional materials and layer types to model, such as cover layers, stiffeners, and adhesives. These materials are intelligent and are understood at design verification as well as the hand-off to manufacturing. Control of where bends occur is critical, so a bend area object defines the location, radius, angle, and origin. Attributes also define placement, routing (e.g., via utilization, trace corners, trace width changes, etc.) and plane metal (e.g., hatch/cross-hatch) rules in the area.

For place and route, each rigid-flex area has its own external/internal layers, so parts can be placed on any external layer (including flex regions and/or in cavities) with appropriate pads and openings automatically handled. During routing, true arcs are utilized to minimize stress fractures in flex regions, and they adhere to the constraint-driven, correct-by-design methodology for which we’re known. Curved teardrops are automatically generated and maintained dynamically. Due to the automation throughout layout, design changes are easy and safe.

To read this entire interview, which appeared in the July 2019 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.

Share




Suggested Items

Material Conservation: The PCB Designer's Role

09/01/2022 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
During these times of supply chain uncertainty, many product developers are considering new ways to conserve materials—from laminates to components, layer reduction, and everything in between. Barry Matties and Happy Holden recently spoke with Alun Morgan, president of EIPC and technology ambassador for Ventec, about material conservation strategies for today’s PCB designers and design engineers. Alun explained why this may be the perfect time to educate PCB designers about conserving materials: When a model is broken, the people involved are much more open to new ideas.

Designing for Material Conservation Means Changing Attitudes

08/29/2022 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
It makes a lot of sense: During times when the supply chain is stretched to the breaking point—and the last few years certainly qualify—what if PCB designers created boards that used fewer components and less laminate? Do PCBs still have to be 0.062" thick? Why not reduce layer count while they’re at it? Andy Shaughnessy and Nolan Johnson spoke with I-Connect007 columnist Dana Korf about the idea of designing a PCB with material conservation in mind. Is it a great new idea, or are we opening a whole new can of worms and a separate group of problems?

Design Tips for Lowering Costs of Fab and Assembly

08/25/2022 | Cherie Litson, CID+, Litson1 Consulting
This is the million-dollar question of every project: How can I cut the cost of the PCB? There are about a thousand answers to this question. There are a few simple guidelines that everyone can follow to reduce costs. I talk about them in my IPC CID and CID+ courses. Designers, fabricators, and assemblers talk about them in a variety of articles. Some professionals who have published some great articles on cost-saving strategies include Tara Dunn, Happy Holden, Chris Church, Kella Knack, Judy Warner, Julie Ellis, Lars Wallin, and many, many others.



Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.